🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," said the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous online content contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is primarily happening at the state government level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

Even as this international conversation continues, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.