🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.